Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2008No. 06-6380PublishedCited by 631 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Peggy L. Bowman appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Ms. Bowman argues that a remand to the Commissioner is necessary because: (1) the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred, as a matter of law, in failing to perform a proper analysis at step four of the five-step sequential evaluation process for determining whether a social security claimant is disabled, see Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart, 431 F.3d 729, 731…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Fischer-Ross v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- William T. WINFREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Doyal v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Robert M. Haddock v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by631 opinions
- Wells v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Getch v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Bales v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Phillips v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Best-Willie v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
626 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.