Legal Opinion
Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 16, 2005No. 04-3509PublishedCited by 740 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
In Clifton v. Chater, 79 F.3d 1007 (10th Cir.1996), we reversed a decision denying a Social Security claimant disability benefits because the administrative law judge (ALJ) “did not discuss the evidence or his reasons for determining that [claimant] was not disabled at step three” of the mandated five-part sequential evaluation process. Id.- at 1008-1010. We concluded the ALJ’s “bare conclusion [was] beyond meaningful judicial review.” Id. at 1009. Relying on Clifton, the district court in this case held an ALJ’s similarly terse step three analysis required reversal.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by740 opinions
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Bowman v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Flaherty v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Carpenter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Krauser v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
735 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.