Legal Opinion
Robert M. Haddock v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1999No. 98-7063PublishedCited by 473 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
If a disability claimant shows that he can no longer perform any of his past jobs, he is disabled unless the administrative law judge (ALJ) finds that he can do some other kind of work. In this case, the ALJ found that claimant retained the residual functional capacity (RFC) only for sedentary work that would allow him to alternate sitting and standing and that was, at most, semi-skilled. In response to the ALJ’s hypothetical question including these restrictions, a vocational expert (VE) summarily identified four jobs claimant os tensibly could perform. The Dictionary of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by473 opinions
- Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jeffrey Pearson v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Nancy Prochaska v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Lindell Washington v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
468 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.