Legal Opinion
General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 7, 1924No. Nos. 293, 294PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). . The bills herein allege in common form adjudications favorable to the patents in suit and rendered before these bills were filed. The answer to these allegations suggests the scope and purpose of a defense trailing through eight.octavo volumes. That answer—
“admits that [the patents of Just and Langmuir] were respectvely held valid [by the courts of this circuit], but alleges that such- findings were influenced by tacit as well as direct representations and statements as to the nature *581and characteristics of the subject-matter of the patents, and as to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & H. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Catalin Corporation of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- American Communications Co., Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- In Re CadyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Byers MacH. Co. v. Keystone Driller Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.