Legal Opinion

Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Platt Rogers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 13, 1944No. 15,094PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

The parties to this suit occupied the same relative positions in the trial court as here, and we will refer to them respectively as plaintiff and defendant. The review is directed to a judgment of the district court refusing to disturb an arbitration award which plaintiff sought to have set aside.

Plaintiff is a mutual ditch and reservoir company, organized under the laws of the State of Colorado by farmers owning lands in Crowley county, and defendant is a corporation engaged in the construction business, with it principal office at Pueblo, Colorado. In addition to previously held water…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Ezell v. Rocky Mountain Bean & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Empson Packing Co. v. ClawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Platt Rogers, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cassara v. WoffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Tombs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API