Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Russo-Asiatic Bank, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff,- entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 1st day of July, 1921, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 11th day of July, 1921, denying defendant’s motions to reopen the case, to be allowed to introduce further proof, and to amend the amended answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Greenbaum, J.:

The complaint sets up two causes of action. The first alleges the residence of the plaintiff in this State; that defendant is a Russian banking corporation; that a firm known as B. B. Hoppe & Co. was of the nature of a corporation or special partnership organized and existing under the laws of Russia; that on January 15, 1918, defendant at its Paris branch received from the Societé des Forces Motrices et Usines de l’Arve (hereinafter called the “ French company ”) a check on the National Bank of Credit in Paris for the sum of 559,000 francs, the proceeds of which it agreed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Gross v. . MendelNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Gross v. MendelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Schwartz v. FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. United States v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  4. In re the Arbitration between J. K. Knitting Mills, Inc. & DorginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Just In-Material Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API