Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 2008No. COA06-1631PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

When the trial court’s supplemental jury instructions are not additional instructions within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1234, the court does not err when it does not consult with the parties or give them an opportunity to be heard before giving the instructions. When the State shows that the violation of defendant’s right to presence under Article I, § 23 of the North Carolina Constitution was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, a new trial is not warranted. When the defendant does not suffer a total deprivation of counsel, a new trial is not warranted. When the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Martin v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. Ledarius Montreal BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. GillikinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API