State v. Haddock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant Kinsey C. Haddock, III, appeals from judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree rape. The dis-positive question presented by this case is whether, when a criminal defendant is tried for second degree rape on the theory of mental incapacitation, it is error for the trial court to fail to instruct the jury that it must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim’s mental incapacitation was due to an act committed upon the victim. Because we conclude that it is, we reverse defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
I. Background
The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.