Legal Opinion
Int'l Indus., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 9, 2018No. Slip Op. 18–39; Court No. 17–00010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnett, Judge:
Plaintiff International Industries, LTD ("Plaintiff" or "IIL") moves, pursuant to United States Court of International Trade ("USCIT") Rule 56.2, for judgment on the agency record, challenging the United States International Trade Commission's ("ITC" or "Commission" or "Defendant") determination that circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe ("CWP") imports from Pakistan are eligible for cumulation with CWP imports from Oman and the United Arab Emirates ("UAE").1 See Confidential Mot. of Pl. International Industries, Ltd. for J. Upon the Agency R. ("Pl.'s Mot."), ECF No. 30;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. And National Steel Corporation and Geneva Steel Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Laclede Steel Company Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Dofasco, Inc., and Uss-Posco Industries, and Ipsco, Inc., and Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Thyssen Stahl Ag and Stelco, Inc., and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Algoma Steel Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., Kern-Liebers Usa, Inc., and Bethlehem Steel Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. National Steel Corporation and United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation, and Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nkk Corporation Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Sidbec-Dosco, Inc., and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. And Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Voest Alpine Stahl Ag, and Ilva, S.P.A., and Siderar S.A.I.C., the Successor of Propulsora Siderurgica S.A.I.C. And Aceros Parana, S.A.I.C., and Stelco, Inc., and Dofasco, Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Empresa Nacional Siderurgica, S.A. And Algoma Steel Inc., and Worthington Industries, Inc. Ilva Usa, Inc. And Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Thyssen Stahl Ag Thyssen Steel Detroit Co. Thyssen Inc. Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag, Defendants/cross-Appellants, and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DAK Americas LLC v. United StatesPublic version posted 06/04/2020.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Tenaris Bay City, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025