Sanford v. City of Tucson
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. George. R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The city of Tucson brought this action in the district court of Pima County to condemn property of the appellee known as “Block 207,” in said city, for the purpose of widening Congress Street, in said city.
The complaint in the action contained the following averments: “(1) That it is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the territory of Arizona; that the defendants S. H. Draehman Cigar Company, a corporation, and Julius Goldbaum, Incorporated, are corporations organized under the laws of Arizona, and doing business in the city of Tucson, Arizona; that defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oury v. GoodwinArizona Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Los Angeles v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Helena v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edwards v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Eugene v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Sanford v. District CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1903
- Territory of Arizona ex rel. Clark v. GainesArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976