Legal Opinion

State v. Holden

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 23, 1998No. 971236-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Defendant, John Holden, appeals the denial of two motions to suppress evidence. The first motion to suppress was premised on the grounds that surreptitious video surveillance and search of trash bags without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 14 of the Utah Constitution. The second motion to suppress was based on the contention that the police had acted in bad faith when they destroyed nonineriminating evidence from the search of the trash bags. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

John Holden lives in Vernal, Utah. His…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.C.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Salt Lake City v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  3. Hudspeth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. PC Scale, Inc. v. Roll Off Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. State v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API