Legal Opinion
Panhans v. Associated Indemnity Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1935No. Civ. 9271PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondent, Ernest Panhans, was severely injured when knocked down by an automobile owned and driven by George King, against whom Panhans subsequently obtained a judgment for damages in the sum of $18,882.75. At the time the accident happened King was covered by a policy of public liability insurance for the principal sum of $5,000 issued by the appellant, Associated Indemnity Company, and King being judgment-proof, Panhans brought the present action under the statutory authority of chapter 367 of the Statutes of 1919 (p. 776) against appellant as King’s insurance carrier, to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Audra H. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. KovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Dalzell v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.