Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Margerum

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

The appellant sued the appellees on certain promissory notes executed by the defendants to the plaintiff. The defendants filed an answer of several paragraphs, which need not be noticed in this opinion. They also filed a cross complaint, alleging, in substance, that Margerum was the principal in the notes, and Howard surety thereon; that the notes were given for the purchase-money in part for certain land described, sold and conveyed by Hinkle to Margerum by warranty deed, excepting from the covenants the lien of the congressional township school loan number 3, etc.; that Hinkle, at the time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Wiley v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Shumaker v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. State ex rel. Foster v. SwartsIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Branham v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Krutz v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Thames Loan & Trust Co. v. BevilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Cutsinger v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API