Legal Opinion
Wolek v. Di Feo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 18, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. Super. 324 (1960)
159 A.2d 127
ANNA WOLEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPHINE DI FEO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 14, 1960.
Decided March 18, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. John H. Jobes argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Darling & Jobes, attorneys).
Mr. Rudolph Markowitz argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiff brought an action in the Chancery Division to enjoin defendant's use of plaintiff's sewer and to recover damages. The complaint alleges that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- A. J. & J. O. Pilar, Inc. v. Lister Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Goldstein v. HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Pilar v. Lister Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powell v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kiler v. BeamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988