Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Hunter
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff for the purpose of securing a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from cutting off the connection of the plaintiff’s dwelling house at No. 1 Ostend place, Far Rockaway, in the borough of Queens, city of New York, with the sewer connected therewith in Grandview avenue.
On or about November 13, 19] 5, one Kean became the owner of property at Far Rockaway running from Ostend place about 300 feet through to Grandview avenue. In this avenue there was a public sewer. Kean caused to be erected on this unified plot of land three dwellings known as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Paine v. . ChandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Butterworth v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Treadwell v. . InsleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Stuyvesant v. EarlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Witter v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Renner v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Mitchell v. HoustleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Pica v. Cross County Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Tufts v. ByrneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.