Legal Opinion

James v. Aetna Life & Casualty

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

When will deviation from permissive use preclude coverage under the omnibus clause? That is the issue to be determined in this appeal from the judgment entered after a bench trial.

Appellants are the parents of a sixteen-year old boy who was killed when a vehicle driven by Leonard Robles collided with the rear-end of a vehicle the boy was attempting to rig for tow, crushing him between the disabled and towing vehicles. The truck operated by Robles was owned by Adams Tree Service, Inc., his employer. Appellants brought a wrongful death action against Robles and Adams.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Speidel v. KellumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NoelDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RagatzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Reisch v. M & D TERMINALS, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API