Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 1990No. WCB TP-88016; CA A51030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

SAIF moved the Workers’ Compensation Board for an

“order requiring [claimant] and his attorney * * * to distribute to SAIF Corporation the sum of $36,324.24 as its [ORS 656.593] share of the (unapproved) third party settlement made in this matter.”

The Board denied the motion on the ground that, because SAIF had denied the underlying claim, it was not the “paying agency” and therefore is not entitled to share in the settlement under ORS 656.593(3). SAIF seeks review of the order. We conclude that the Board had no authority to rule on the motion.

Claimant was injured in an automobile accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schlecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Bernards v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CowartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Toole ex rel. Professional Liability Fund v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API