Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1990No. WCB TP-88016; CA A51030PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Claimant petitions for review of our decision, 102 Or App 598, 795 P2d 604 (1990), and we treat the matter as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. Claimant seeks reconsider ation of our designation of SAIF as the prevailing party and our order denying his petition for attorney fees pursuant to ORS 656.390. We allow reconsideration and modify our opinion to designate claimant as the prevailing party. We deny reconsideration of claimant’s petition for attorney fees.

We concluded that the Board did not have authority to rule on SAIF’s motion, reversed its decision and remanded with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Toole ex rel. Professional Liability Fund v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API