State v. Chemeres
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, J. —
The appellant, George Chemeres, was tried before a jury and found guilty of the offense of living with a common prostitute in violation of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2440 [P. C. § 9112] (5), and, from the judgment entered on the verdict, he has taken this appeal.
The appellant contends that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the fact that he had lived with one Lydia Meiers on or about the second day of November, 1942, and that no competent evidence was introduced by the state that she was then a common prostitute.
There is evidence in the record from which the jury, by its verdict,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Falfurrias Immigration Co. v. SpielhagenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. McGintyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Davidson v. RyleTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. TrombleyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. RutherfordWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.