Legal Opinion

State v. McGinty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1942No. 28609PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

— Defendant, William P. McGinty, was. charged with violation of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2440 [P. C. § 9112], subd. (5), by an information in which it was alleged that, on or about August 5, 1941, he “unlawfully and feloniously did live with one Patricia O’Hara, the said Patricia O’Hara then and there being a common prostitute.” The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and, from the judgment and sentence entered on the verdict, he has taken this appeal. $

By his assignments of error, appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. HoledgerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. WinnettWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Williamson v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. CharltonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. KosankeWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Joseph Gartner San Fratello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API