Legal Opinion
Petition of Gregory Malisos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 12, 2014No. 2013-0434PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The petitioner, Gregory Malisos, seeks review of a ruling of the respondent, the board of trustees (board) of the New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS), that his legally separated spouse did not qualify for the medical subsidy benefit set forth in RSA 100-A:52,1 (2013). We reverse.
The record supports the following facts. The petitioner retired effective July 1,2008, after twenty-four years and eight months of creditable service as a police officer with the Town of Windham (Town). When he retired, the petitioner continued his and his wife’s health insurance coverage through the Town’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Appeal of the Town of NottinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State Employees' Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- In Re State Employees'ass'n of NhSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of StewartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Desaulnier v. DesaulnierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
3Cited by17 opinions
- Appeal of Robert C. Michele & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Jeremy Olson & a. v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Appeal of Raymond CoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Attorney General, Director of Charitable Trusts v. Loreto Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Appeal of THI of New Hampshire at Derry, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.