Chipokas v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
Is there a duty to defend, under a professional liability insurance policy, against a claim of a fraudulent or dishonest act when the policy excludes liability coverage for such acts? The trial court held there was no duty to defend and we agree.
This action arose because of claims made in earlier suits. Plaintiff is a Cedar Rapids attorney. The Travelers Indemnity Company, defendant [Travelers] issued to plaintiff a professional liability insurance policy which was in effect during the years 1970 and 1971. Under the policy Travelers agreed:
“To pay on behalf of the insured all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Conner v. Transamerica Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- McAndrews v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Continental Insurance Co. v. BonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Sterling Merchandise Co. v. Hartford Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.