Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 21, 2008No. CV 06-5160-RCPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Carmen Padilla filed a complaint on August 17, 2006, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her applications for disability benefits. On January 10, 2007, the Commissioner answered the complaint and the parties filed a joint stipulation on June 12, 2007.
BACKGROUND
I
On March 26, 2003 (protective filing date), plaintiff applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, and the Supplemental Security Income program (“SSI”) of Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carl Edlund v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Laura G. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- (SS) Adams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (SS) Dean v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.