Clinton Harmon and Maria E. Harmon v. Toyo Tire USA Corp.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CLINTON HARMON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 5:21-CV-0724-JKP TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP.; et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 33 and 34) filed by two distinct groups of defendants. Movants are aptly described as (1) “Toyo,” which encompasses Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp.; Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc.; and Nitto Tire U.S.A. Inc. and (2) “Bridgestone,” which encompasses Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (“BATO”) and Bridgestone Americas, Inc.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.