Hearst v. State

Paddock, J.:

Thomas Lewis Hearst appeals the district court’s decision summarily dismissing his habeas corpus petition.

We affirm.

Hearst claims the district court erred by finding his due process rights were not violated during his parole revocation proceedings. He also claims the district court erred by dismissing his petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing.

Although we find there was a due process violation, we find the violation was cured by the decision of the Kansas Parole Board (KPB) at the final revocation hearing. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the habeas corpus…