Relentless Air Racing, LLC v. Airborne Turbine Ltd. Partnership
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Relentless Air Racing, LLC (Relentless), obtained a money judgment against limited partnership, Airborne Turbine Ltd. Partnership (Airborne). Unable to collect the judgment, Relentless moved to add two natural persons and two corporations as judgment debtors. The trial court found that the natural persons and the corporations were the alter egos of Airborne. But the court denied the motion because it found Relentless failed to show that treating Airborne as a separate entity would lead to an inequitable result.
We reverse. Relentless cannot collect its judgment because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jines v. AbarbanelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
3Cited by13 opinions
- Highland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of BanningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Alexandria Real Estate etc. v. Bugsby Property, LLC CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Aram Hodess v. Wayne WongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Butler America v. Aviation Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Carlson v. ClapperDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.