Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Inhabitants of Taunton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, Alfred Nadeau, was killed at about 5:10 p.m. on December 1, 1920, by coming in contact with a charged wire maintained by the municipal lighting plant of the defendant. Prior to the accident the wire had parted: one end hung suspended from a tree on the easterly side of Bay Street, and the other lay in the gutter, for approximately twenty feet, concealed by water and dead leaves. Nadeau was on his way home from work. It was dark and raining at the time. He crossed Bay Street, carrying an umbrella over his head; stepped upon the broken wire which was concealed in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boutlier v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Knight v. Overman Wheel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Battany v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Pierce v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Martin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Pittsfield Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Alden v. Norwood Arena, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Coburn v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API