D & R Pipeline Construction Co. v. Greene County
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action in two counts. The first count sought damages based on inverse condemnation. It alleged that by failing to rezone plaintiff’s property defendant has taken it without compensation. Count II sought a declaratory judgment that the zoning classification for defendant’s property was unlawful and void. Plaintiff dismissed Count II and thereafter the trial court found that Count I failed to state a claim for which the relief sought could be granted, and entered judgment in favor of defendant.
Count I alleged that the defendant had refused to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elam v. City of St. AnnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Harris v. Missouri Conservation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Wintercreek Apartments v. City of St. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
- Brown Harris Ii v. Missouri Conservation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986