Legal Opinion
Bisca v. Bisca
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard F. McCaffrey, J.
The cardinal issue of injunctive relief under CPLR article 63 is involved in this matter under the new equitable distribution law, that is, to what extent may the plaintiff wife restrain, pendente lite, the defendant husband with respect to certain assets over which he has control.
It seems to this court that temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions in cases within the purview of the equitable distribution law will be sought routinely as a matter of course, simply to put a hold or freeze on things for purposes of maintaining the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Mills Novelty Co. v. SundermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Town of Porter v. Chem-Trol Pollution Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Park Terrace Caterers, Inc. v. McDonoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co. v. TomitzNew York Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guttman v. GuttmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- International Union of Operating Engineers v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Kriger v. KrigerNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Hertzler v. HertzlerNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Kimm v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.