Legal Opinion

Mills Novelty Co. v. Sunderman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The action was brought to enjoin the defendants “ from in any wise preventing or interfering with the removal, shipping or transporting from this state by plaintiff ” of certain property described in the complaint as “ coin-operated automatic merchandise vending machines.” The essential allegations of the complaint are that plaintiff on and prior to May 3, 1934, was and now is the owner, lawfully entitled to the possession of the machines; that they were stored in a warehouse in New York city; that by various acts, the police between May 3 and May 9,1934, prevented delivery thereof to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Young v. SundermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Reed v. LittletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. In re B. Turecamo Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. De Veau v. BraistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Quinn v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API