Legal Opinion

Kimm v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Schoenfeld, J.

In this action for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief plaintiff Walter E. Kimm, Jr. seeks, essentially, to compel defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York (Blue Cross) and the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) to pay for the full-time nursing care he currently requires as a result of a stroke he suffered on October 25, 1989. Plaintiff now moves preliminarily to enjoin Blue Cross from denying reimbursement to plaintiff for this care. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff first subscribed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. AnnunziataNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API