Legal Opinion
CTS Corp. v. Electro Materials Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1979No. 70 Civ. 433 (JMC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendant’s application for attorneys’ fees is granted, in part. Plaintiff is directed to compensate defendant in the amount of $306,532. 35 U.S.C. § 285.
In the Opinion filed herein on February 26, 1979, the Court awarded attorneys’ fees to defendant Electro Materials Corporation of America [“EMCA”] and directed it to submit a fee application if the parties could not agree on an amount. CTS Corp. v. Electro Materials Corp., 469 F.Supp. 801, 823-25 (S.D.N.Y.1979). No agreement was reached and defendant submitted an application seeking…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Holly v. AcreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Larchmont Engineering, Inc. v. Toggenburg Ski Center, Inc., Larchmont Engineering, Inc. v. Greek Peak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- CTS Corp. v. Electro Materials Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merchandise Nat'l Bk. of Chicago v. ScanlonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Bill Rivers Trailers, Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Helton v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Selzer v. BerkowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.