Legal Opinion
CTS Corp. v. Electro Materials Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1979No. 70 Civ. 433 (JMC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNELLA, District Judge:
After a bench trial, the Court grants defendant judgment on its counterclaim and declares Faber, et a/., U. S. Patent No. 3,304,199, invalid. 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103.
The complaint, charging defendant with patent infringement, is dismissed.
Jurisdiction is based on the federal patent laws. 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
Plaintiff CTS Corporation [“CTS”] is an Indiana corporation with its principal place of business at Elkhart, Indiana. Defendant Electro Materials Corporation of America [“EMCA”] is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at Mamaroneck, New…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- CTS Corp. v. Electro Materials Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Piher, S. A. v. Cts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.