Legal Opinion

Perlson v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Judgment in favor of Robert Perlson. Although defendants appealed from this judgment, they have suggested no error which could possibly affect it, and it will be affirmed.

2. Are the damages awarded to Philip Perlson supported by the evidencef The jury assessed Philip Perlson’s damages as follows: Medical and hospital expenses: $4,866; Loss of earnings: none; pain and suffering and disability: $12,500. Appellants’ attack on the damage findings is based on a claim that there was no evidence to show that Philip Perlson’s sufferings after the accident were caused by it. Appellants do not seem…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Fredrickson v. KabatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kresge v. Miner Amusement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simpsen v. Madison General Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wurtzler v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Johnson v. Bar-Mour, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Wurtzler v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API