Legal Opinion

Kresge v. Miner Amusement Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

This controversy arises out of the following facts: On the 28th day of October, 1932, the Neon Manufacturing Corporation of St. Paul, Minnesota, entered into a contract with the Miner Amusement Company of Rice Lake, Wisconsin, by which it agreed that it would manufacture and deliver according to specifications a neon sign, in consideration of which the Miner Amusement Company, hereinafter called the “Company,” was to pay $625, $75 in cash, and on the same day and as a part of the same transaction it gave its note for $600, which was executed and signed as follows : “Miner Amusement Co., G. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whalen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. Meinshausen v. A. Gettelman Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Halvorson v. TarnowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Perlson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Johnson v. Bar-Mour, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API