Legal Opinion

Town of Blooming Grove v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*450Wingert, J.

1. Summary judgment properly denied. The order denying the city’s motion for summary judgment must be affirmed, because the pleadings and affidavits disclose the existence of a material issue of fact, i. e., whether or not the petition for annexation bore the required number of signatures of electors and property owners at the time the annexation ordinance was adopted.

It is essential to the validity of an annexation that the petition bear the required number of signatures at the time the ordinance is adopted. Greenfield v. Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 610, 613, 76 N. W. (2d) 320; Town of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Badtke v. School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Meinshausen v. A. Gettelman Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Town of Brookfield v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Milwaukee v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Town of Campbell v. City of La CrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. Village of MononaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Perlson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API