Legal Opinion

Kienke v. Kirsch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1931No. 27740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Horth, District Judge.

This is an action to recover a balance due upon a promissory note, bearing date May 6, 1918, due five years after date and executed by the defendants Chris Kirsch and George J.' Kirsch, father and son, to the plaintiff, the note representing the purchase price of 61 shares of the capital stock of the Burton State Bank, of Burton, Nebraska, a commercial banking corporation, having paid-up capital of $10,000. The note is in the words and figures following:

“$9,867.36. Burton, Nebr. May 6, 1918.
“Five years after date, for value received, I, we, or either of us, promise to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seale v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gerner v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gibbons v. AndersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1897
  4. Citizens State Bank v. StrayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kienke v. HudsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kirchman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ablett v. HartzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Kienke v. HudsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API