Legal Opinion
Artificial Intelligence Corp. v. Casey (In Re Casey)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided March 1, 1996No. 19-00364PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION
PETER W. BOWIE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Thomas F. Casey (“Debtor”) brings this Motion to Dismiss several related adversary proceedings on the basis that they were not timely served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 4(j), as made applicable to bankruptcy proceedings in its 1990 version by Rule 7004, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. This Rule requires the service of adversary complaints within 120 days of filing. The debtor contends that the present complaints for non-dischargeability were served almost 150 days after they were filed and that no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gregory Whale v. United States of America, United States Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cartage Pacific, Inc. v. Waldner (In Re Waldner)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ChabotUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Abbey v. Retz (In Re Retz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007
- In Re LuxfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007
- Bucher v. Hughes (In re Hughes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Premier Capital v. DeCarolisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002