Legal Opinion

Hale v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 14, 2019No. 18-1607Published

1Opinion of the Court

3Jn tbe Wniteb ~ta:tes QCourt of jfebera:I QCia:ints No. 18-1607T (Pro Se) (Filed: May 14, 2019) ) Keywords: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; ANNICE HALE, ) Tax Refund; Offset; Illegal Exaction; ) Presumption of Correctness; I.R.C. Plaintiff, ) § 6511; I.R.C. § 6532; I.R.C. § 7422; ) Statute of Limitations. V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________ ) Annice Hale, Houston, TX, pro se. Katherine R. Powers, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section, Washington, DC, with whom were G. Robson Stewart, Assistant Chief, Comi of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API