Legal Opinion

Hilderbrand v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1935No. 24264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

This case has once before been to this court. N., C. & St. L. Ry. v. Hilderbrand, 48 Ga. App. 140 (172 S. E. 87). There this court held that the demurrer filed by the defendant company to the plaintiff’s petition was properly overruled. Plaintiff contends in this court that the evidence introduced at the trial proved his case as laid, and that, the court having held that the demurrer was properly overruled* he is entitled to have a jury pass upon the issues involved. Unquestionably, if the evidence supports the allegations of the petition, and does not show some other fact which would as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Central Trust Co. of New York v. Chattanooga, R. & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1895
  3. Armour Car Lines v. SummerourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HilderbrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Branan v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fricks v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  2. Moore v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API