Anderson v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
1. The question which primarily moved this court to grant the application for certiorari was whether the injured child, under the circumstances of this case, was an invitee or a licensee. The Court of Appeals held the child to be an invitee. While we agree with that decision, the opinion of the Court of Appeals contains language which we believe to be subject to misconstruction which might lead to a misunderstanding as to the duty of the courts of this State in considering, following, and construing the enactments of the General Assembly. For this reason, we have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- McCall v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Petree v. Davison-Paxon-Stokes Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Baxley v. Williams Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Chambers v. Peacock Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Handiboe v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Etheridge Motors, Inc. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.