Legal Opinion

Bonham v. Mendenhall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1934No. 14,631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellee by a complaint in one paragraph for damages sustained to appellant’s automobile in a collision with appellee’s car.

The evidence has not been brought into the record, but the only question raised is upon the giving by the court of instruction No. 5, which reads as follows:

“The burden is upon the plaintiff to prove that the driver of her car was free from contributory negligence. The law requires said driver to have a driver’s license, and if the evidence fails to show that the driver, Brown, had a driver’s license then plaintiff has failed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Mankin v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. KorbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Repczynski v. MikulakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. GARATONI GARATONI v. TeegardenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Chandler v. KranerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API