Legal Opinion
Repczynski v. Mikulak
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1927No. 12,737PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.
Action by Walter Mikulak, by his next friend, against Gustav Repczynski and Antoinette Repczynski to recover for personal injuries sustained by appellee as a result of being struck by an automobile which was being operated by Stanley Repczynski, the minor son of appellants. Complaint was answered by denial. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee. Separate motions for appellants for a new trial having been overruled, this appeal is prosecuted.
It appears from the evidence that Stanley, the 15- year-old son of appellants, was, with his parents’ permission, accustomed to operate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Rush v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Rocca v. SteinmetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Schultz v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flynn v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Moore v. WaittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Smith v. THOMASIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.