Triangle Pacific Philadelphia Corp. v. Trident Enterprises, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN der VOORT, Judge:
The question on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in proceeding to trial in this assumpsit action in the absence of defendant or its counsel.
We believe there was an abuse of discretion in this case, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Most of the pertinent facts are not disputed. The case had originally been submitted to arbitrators, who found for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. In December, 1975, a “Notice to the Bar” appeared in the Legal Intelligencer informing attorneys that all cases on appeal from arbitration would be assigned for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Krull v. KrullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Skilton v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Associated Sprinkler Co. v. GiansanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Triangle Pacific Philadelphia Corp. v. Trident Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Associated Sprinkler Co. v. GiansanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.