Krull v. Krull
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
Though differing slightly in facts, the policies at issue in this case closely resemble those of Budget Laundry Company v. Munter, 450 Pa. 13, 298 A. 2d 55 (1972).. We believe that the guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in that case, when applied to the situation herein presented, require that we reverse and remand this case for a new hearing. See also Felsing v. Beining, 236 Pa. Superior Ct. 202, 345 A.2d 290 (1975).
The record reveals that appellant and appellee are husband and wife, and that appellee has custody of their two children. On November 15, 1974,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Nerkowski v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- State Board of Medical Education & Licensure v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Felsing v. BeiningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Triangle Pacific Philadelphia Corp. v. Trident Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. KrutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. KrutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.