Legal Opinion

Krull v. Krull

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 241PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

Though differing slightly in facts, the policies at issue in this case closely resemble those of Budget Laundry Company v. Munter, 450 Pa. 13, 298 A. 2d 55 (1972).. We believe that the guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in that case, when applied to the situation herein presented, require that we reverse and remand this case for a new hearing. See also Felsing v. Beining, 236 Pa. Superior Ct. 202, 345 A.2d 290 (1975).

The record reveals that appellant and appellee are husband and wife, and that appellee has custody of their two children. On November 15, 1974,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Nerkowski v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. State Board of Medical Education & Licensure v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Felsing v. BeiningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Triangle Pacific Philadelphia Corp. v. Trident Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. In re HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. KrutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. KrutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API