Associated Sprinkler Co. v. Giansante

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

This appeal arises out of an action in assumpsit. Appellee filed suit against appellants for the balance due on a contract for goods and services. The complaint alleged that appellants had used Transit Construction Company (hereafter referred to as the Company) as a means to defraud appellee. Appellee claims that appellants controlled the company. Judgment by default for failure to file an answer was entered on March 9, 1976. By agreement, judgment was opened on April 26,1976. Appellants filed an answer to *10the complaint on June 7, 1976, in which they denied the majority…