American MacHinery Movers, Inc. v. MacHinery Movers of New Orleans, LLC
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED.
Background
Defendant, Darryl Breland worked for the plaintiff, American Machinery Movers, Inc. (AMM), for over twenty years. From 1978 until 1994 he was employed as a welder. In 1994 he was promoted to general manager. However, his employment with AMM came to an end on June 5, 2000. AMM maintains that Breland was terminated for secretly establishing his own business while working for AMM. Approximately one month after he was fired from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Wilkerson v. StalderDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2007
- ABLE SECURITY AND PATROL, LLC. v. LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- Estate of Barré v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.