Legal Opinion
Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 7, 2009No. Civil Action 08-3535PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants’ motion. The Court also DENIES plaintiffs motion as premature.
I. Background
This case arises out of defendants’ alleged mishandling of plaintiffs confidential personal information. In 2006, plaintiff visited defendant Crescent City Tax Service, Inc., d/b/a Jackson Hewitt Tax Service (“Crescent City”), in Metairie, Louisiana to have her 2005 federal and state tax returns…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Baker v. PutnalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Lang v. DirecTV, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Paul v. Providence Health System-OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Estate of Barré v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.