Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Florida Steel Corporation (Tampa Forge and Iron Division)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1962No. 19145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents one question for our determination: whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the Board’s findings that Respondent discriminatorily discharged two employees in violation of § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act and interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of § 8(a) (1) of the Act. 1 We hold that there is not.

The question arises upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board 2 for enforcement of its order 3 *issued on June 19, 1961, against the Florida Steel…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottiling Company, Inc., Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Piezo Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc., and James L. Ogle, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Dobbs Houses, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Pacific Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Riggs Distler & Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API