Legal Opinion
Knott v. Crown Colony Farm, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-SC-892-DGPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
The principal question we address in this appeal is whether failure to name the attorney of Crown Colony Farm, Inc. as a party is fatal to the appeal.
In October-November 1990, James Knott’s estranged business partner, Dick Brooks, boarded a number of horses with Crown Colony. One of these horses, a thoroughbred mare by the name of Silver Design, was actually owned by the Dixie Sport Partnership of which Knott owned 75%. Knott claims that he was the managing partner in the Knott-Brooks partnership, that Silver Design was to be sold to his account, and that Brooks, acting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Bartlett v. Louisville Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Tyler v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Louisville Label, Inc. v. HildesheimKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Braden c. Republic-Vanguard Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Swan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Neidlinger v. NeidlingerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
- O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.